I was about a year into the research for Sports and Games
of Medieval Cultures when my husband commented, “that’s worse than writing
a research paper in college.” My response? “Or better, if you enjoy research!”
One of the most important things we do as non-fiction
writers is research. Several of us have written about research on this blog
over the years, you can check out a couple of those essays here, here and here.
(By the way, did you know you can search our old entries by putting a term, such as "research," into the box on the right, just below the QR code?) But I thought a general overview might be useful for anyone starting out in the
non-fiction world.
When I begin to research a new topic, either because I’ve
been given an assignment or because it has struck me as having potential for a
book or article, I follow a broad-to-focused pattern. If I start with
information that is very specialized, I may misunderstand or misinterpret what
I find. So I generally start with two kinds of sources which will not wind up
in my bibliography: children’s books and encyclopedias.
Both of these will give me broad overviews of my topic, in
relatively straightforward, layperson’s language. They will help me get my
bearings in a sea of unfamiliar terms and concepts. In the case of an idea I’m
researching on spec, they’ll help me decide if I actually want to pursue the
topic. I would not cite either in my research bibliography because they are
what I would call “tertiary” sources – they’re based on someone else’s
research. Most publishers explicitly say “don’t use encyclopedias” – but they
don’t mean “don’t read them,” they mean, “don’t base your writing on them.”
(see also Wikipedia, below).
Because I write primarily for children and young people,
reading children’s books about my topic doubles as market research, helping me
establish what is already out there in my field, and what gaps or needs for
updates exist. In the American’s Notable Women series we include
age-appropriate “for further reading” lists, so I will also note any of the
books I read that I think will be suitable for that.
Having gotten some background on my subject from these very
wide-angle lenses, I now move on to more focused material. Beginning with any
references in the encyclopedia entries and children’s books, I assemble a
spreadsheet of any resource I can find. Now I am looking for more in-depth
information, so I will hunt down adult books on my subject, articles in both general
and trade publications, websites and journals. I include on this list people
who I might try to interview – other authors, university professors, and in the
case of biographical subjects, people who have spoken about them or who knew
them. I’ll be checking Google Books and Google Scholar, the online catalogs of
universities (try Harvard's), World Cat and Jstor. I’m also keeping an eye out for primary
source material – the golden chalice of biography, words written and spoken by
the subject themselves. In the case of a person still working, their own
website or columns may be readily accessible, but oftentimes I’m watching for
references to letters or diaries in the secondary sources, and drilling down in
their bibliographies for the places where those precious documents may be
stored. Newspaper archive.com, Highbeam research and Questia are excellent
resources (each of those require subscriptions), as are the online archives of major newspapers (The New York Timesarchives are free for material prior to 1923 and since 1986, $3.95/article for
things in the 1923-1986 date range: but you can search their index and then
take your list of hits to a library with the NYT microfilm, read and print out
what is pertinent.)
A word of caution here – as you are browsing, make some
record of EVERYTHING you read, even if it’s just a print-out of your browser
history at the end of the day. You never know when you’re going to want to use
a tidbit that you ran across early in your research and didn’t copy because you
didn’t think it was important. And I can guarantee you that when you do, it
will be almost impossible to find it again! You should also capture webpages
when you read them, as their content may change before you finish the book –
save them on your hard drive as html or pdf so you can access them again. There
are lots of different ways to keep track of all your information: I generally
try to keep most things in file folders on my computer, with matching folders
for anything I have only in hard copy. Notes in the spreadsheet can tell me
where I’ve stashed things (and what library I borrowed any books from, in case
I need to access them again!)
Of course the more in-person research you can do, the better
it is for your writing. Whether you’re standing in a lab watching the process
you’re going to describe or sitting in the rare books room holding a manuscript
by the author you’re profiling, the chance to be there is worth a great deal of
effort. There’s no substitute for having visited a person’s home when you’re
trying to describe it later. But the reality of our work is that this is not
always possible. I could not have afforded to go to Texas to visit the homes of
the women I profiled in Women of the Lone Star State, nor to have
visited the museums in Europe, Asia and Australia that preserve so much of the
material I wrote about in Sport and Games. The internet has made
research possible today that would have been impossible a few decades ago. We
can read newspaper articles from the past three centuries, see photographs of
medieval and ancient artifacts, and read the diaries of people who lived
through the actual events we are researching, all without leaving our desks.
With that wealth of access has come a new crop of potential
pitfalls. The ease of putting up websites and producing e-books has made it all
too easy for people to present as facts their own opinions or the misguided
results of other people’s research. It’s not just Wikipedia, which you should
use just the way you would a printed encyclopedia – as a place to get a quick
overview and to mine for references. You’ll find factoids and spin in all kinds
of places.
Even a renowned expert on a subject brings to it his or her own
preconceived notions and treasured conclusions. Bias is inescapable. Your
challenge, as a researcher, is to vet and double-check, to bring in as many and
as diverse a collection of sources as you can find; to judiciously examine and
consider the credentials of the person making the statement. Just because
someone has a PhD in economics doesn’t mean their opinion on climate change has
any more weight than your mother’s, for example (much less weight if your
mother happens to have her degree in climatology).
One way to vet information is simply to see if you can find
it again in other, unrelated sources (but drill down to be sure that they are
not all citing the same, possibly erroneous reference). Check and consider the
dates of contradictory information: later scholarship frequently corrects
earlier errors, but contemporaneous sources may be more reliable than later
recollections and retellings. Another important step is to ask someone – a researcher
or professor in the subject area – what the current scholastic opinion is about
the purported fact. (Interviews should generally be conducted after you’ve done
all the broad research and a good deal of the secondary level work, so that you
have a good grasp of the subject, will understand what your expert is telling
you, and will know what questions you would like to ask.)
Keep careful notes, check your sources, and organize what you find, and your research process will be both enjoyable and productive!
1 comment:
Excellent advice as always, Sally. Special attention should be paid to your word of caution. I don't know how many times I had to sift through pages and pages of information to find that tidbit I didn't think I'd use.
Post a Comment